And you'd do the study without knowing what had been 'said' to the water specimens, so your subjective opinions wouldn't colour the results. No, that wasnt intended specifically as an attack on supersymmetric models; the fact that Hagelin worked on them isnt an argument for or against them. Z. Knight and heavily features commentary from 'Ramtha', an ancient Atlantian general who is apparently speaking through Knight. "I think the point is that Feynman realized that people can be fooled, but nature can't.". The film was also discussed in a letter published in Physics Today that challenges how physics is taught, saying teaching fails to "expose the mysteries physics has encountered [and] reveal the limits of our understanding". But quantum mechanics, for better or worse, doesn't bring any more spiritual benefits than gravity does. And a lot of people talk about quantum consciousness that even if the everyday world we see is not a system that can be changed, our consciousness about the world can be changed. Well, people are able to undergo various transformations. They're coming into the marketplace hungry for direction, but they don't want some person who claims to have all the answers. This is the first coronavirus vaccine approved by the FDA, and is expected to open the door to more vaccine mandates. Nobody does.". [1], In mid-2005, the filmmakers worked with HCI Books to expand on the film's themes in a book titled What the Bleep Do We Know! DO WE KNOW? You can renew your subscription or ft. indoor riding arena once used for horse training which was refurbished and floored . Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us so, in a leap of creatively edited logic 3. Moreover, the movie proposes no plausible physical mechanism by which thoughts influence matter. Quantum mechanics is crazy, but it's just crazy enough to make the world still be sensible at a macroscopic level, the level that we experience. He points out that Gallo et al anounced that AIDS is caused by HIV at a press conference, without there being a single paper published in a scientific journal substantiating this. Around 650 million people watched the moment on television. asks nothing but . Some credible researchers appear, including neurologist Andrew Newberg and physicist David Albert (Albert has since disassociated himself from the film, saying his views were misrepresented). But above a tiny size range, quantum properties collapse, and particles start to behave in the way described by classical physics - more like bowling balls than fuzzy clouds of "wave functions. He says he is "profoundly unsympathetic to attempts at linking quantum mechanics with consciousness".[1]. 1. "[15], Bernie Hobbs, a science writer with ABC Science Online, explains why the film is incorrect about quantum physics and reality: "The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. "Quantum physics calculates only possibilities Who/what chooses among these possibilities to bring the actual event of experience? The reason you should be suspicious is because we don't even understand classical consciousness. so much for no good or bad, that is unless it is convienent. It's there. [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? Perhaps that is why they couldnt see them. !" is a radical departure from convention. Dr. Jeffrey Satinover (psychiatrist, PhD candidate in physics), in What the Bleep Do We Know? So far, so good. By clicking 'Send to a friend' you agree ABC Online is not responsible for the content contained in your email message. List of films featuring the deaf and hard of hearing, "How the NXIVM Sex Cult Defended Trump from Media Attacks", "Cinefex article detailing the visual effects for the film", "New Age: What the Bleep? We're such a shallow people. You can be accurate in one or the other, but not in both. By 1984 he had moved to Maharishi University and started building up the physics department there. [4] The visual-effects team, led by Evan Jacobs, worked closely with the other film-makers to create visual metaphors that would capture the essence of the film's technical subjects with attention to aesthetic detail. and What the #$*! Isnt that a bit like attacking algebra because of Serge Langs nutty ideas about HIV and AIDS? I think of what Niels Bohr said to Wolfgang Pauli about theories that are "not crazy enough to be true." But they add that the film shows quantum mysteries selectively to shore up metaphysical points. Q: You do see that in some science-fiction shows for example, last season on "Fringe." The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just entertainment. So on one hand you have a threat to security, and on the other you have a possible boon for security. Whether you're religious, spiritual, or none of the above, you can say one thing for this movie: it's an equal-opportunity offender. Bleep raises thought-provoking questions about science and its relationship to spirituality and metaphysics. But quantum mechanics rules out the possibility of hidden variables. The figures are a bit rubbery, but the idea that we're only 'aware' of a fraction of our brain's activity is both correct and a huge relief. What the Bleep Do We Know postulates the existence of a spiritual connection between the realms of quantum physics and consciousness, demonstrating this through inspiring visual effects, story-telling and interviews with experts. We might be able to create quantum computers, for example, that will simultaneously do many different calculations at once, because the quantum world is capable of doing many things at the same time. Hidden Messages In Water Hidden Messages in . This movie agrees with the scientists as far as the existence of the so called empty space is concerned. "[20], Journalist John Gorenfeld, writing in Salon, notes that the film's three directors are students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment, which he says has been described as a cult. "[5] The same article quotes Bill Pfau, Advertising Manager of Inner Traditions, as saying "More and more ideas from the New Age community have become accepted into the mainstream. You can't bring good things to you by thinking about them. This is an explanation to help understand what might be going on, but it is not part of the theory because it is not falsifiable: it cannot be tested in such a way that, if it were false, it would fail the test (without falsifying the whole of quantum mechanics, and therefore all the other interpretations too). In the letter, the authors write: "the movie illustrates the uncertainty principle with a bouncing basketball being in several places at once. Nasa found something. The movie gives two examples of experiments which have shown the power of the mind affecting reality. Featuring two (!) So you forgive the film's jelly-baby graphics, daggy storyline, and that Gabor sister channelling a warrior spirit from Atlantis. This will be revisited if anyone else tries to circumvent a channel ban in future.PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:I'm citing \"Fair Use\" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.http://www.aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/asset_upload_file939_6218.pdfAlso \"Fair Dealing\" under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4ahttp://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_4Censorship is NOT a valid argument.This is the first part of my critical analysis of \"What The Bleep Do We Know?! Simon Singh called it pseudoscience and said the suggestion "that if observing water changes its molecular structure, and if we are 90% water, then by observing ourselves we can change at a fundamental level via the laws of quantum physics" was "ridiculous balderdash". 2) "What the Bleep Do We Know" has sure got a lot of people talking and thinking. Beliefnet is a lifestyle website providing feature editorial content around the topics of inspiration, spirituality, health, wellness, love and family, news and entertainment. you are agreeing to our, One month free trial to theMonitorDaily, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor, Performance of quantum computer no better than ordinary PC, say analysts, 'Spooky' physics: How quantum entanglement could link wormholes, Quantum 'teleportation' distance record broken. 7. Author, speaker, and award-winning Writer/Director/Producer Mark Vicente was part of the creative team behind the sleeper hit "What The Bleep Do We Know?!". And wait-the human body is mostly water! "They take advantage of things we don't know very well or can't test very well, then use it in an unfair way," notes Andr de Gouva, a particle physicist at Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill. And in fact we can make weird quantum phenomena happen. When you hear the term "quantum consciousness," you should be suspicious. There was some sort of plot involving a woman photographer (played by Marlee Matlin), who wanders around and has anxiety attacks. was heavily criticised for being "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); document.getElementById( "ak_js_2" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); WatchDocumentaries.com | Games | Quizzes | Contact |Privacy & Terms | Manage Cookies |Advertise | DMCA, Aleister Crowley: The Wickedest Man in the World. 8. We hear more and more from JZ Knight, a woman channeling the ancient warrior Ramtha, a chap who (through Knight) incidentally leads the Ramtha School of Enlightenment. But she is right about us not seeing things in front of our eyes if we're not looking for them. presents a viewpoint of the physical universe and human life within it, with connections to neuroscience and quantum physics. That's why we experience a classical world. Her perceptions of reality are challenged and she begins to realise how the material world is impacted by the consciousness of individuals and groups. (commonly referred to by its spoken title What the Bleep Do We Know) is a 2004 pseudoscientific film that supports the idea that consciousness and quantum mechanics are somehow related. From my perspective, once you had identtified Smolins position( I gave this in previous post[Posted by sol at September 25, 2004 04:18 PM] ), then you would know he holds Einsteins, in relation to the Solvay meetings, and strings have modified what Bohr and Schrodinger were doing in developing QM. I think its a good idea for people to consider the example of Hagelin: hes completely delusional and has zero common sense, but able to function at a high level in the particle theory community. Staff meetings are tedious enough give me a conscious mind with a decent filter device any day. Hagelin was a grad student at Harvard when I was an undergrad and I met him when we were in the same quantum field theory class. "We only see what we believe is possible Native American Indians on Caribbean Islands couldn't see Columbus's ships [sitting on the horizon] because they were beyond their knowledge" Dr. Candace Pert (former scientist, current new-age guru) in What the Bleep Do We Know? Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. [5] Foreign gross added another $5 million for a worldwide gross of nearly $16 million. The whole thing is really moronic beyond belief. Pingback: yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? To accomplish that, you would have to invoke "new physics," Dr. Schumm says, in which the explanation can be verified or falsified through experiment. Blech. DVD (2005) Marlee Matlin, Arntz (DIR) cert 12 at the best online prices at eBay! Your session to The Christian Particles Popping Into & Out of Existence. Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. You can't just hope for the best. Often, people who are trying to sell whatever it is they're trying to sell try to justify it on the basis of science. Despite his caveats, he recommends that people see the film, stating: "I hope it develops into a cult movie in the UK as it has in the US. Answer: Photographer. This is one reason physicists studying a subatomic particle create large numbers of them in particle accelerators. 3) Lots of people still hunger for a magical universe, and now hope that science can deliver it, after Nietsche's announcement of God's death. During our current Covid19 pandemic, this collection is highly relevant to a world still seeking novel answers to the human condition and also drawn to old theories long ago debunked. A lot of the propaganda from them was hilarious, especially whenever candidates attempted to hold public speeches and performing demonstrations of yogic flying. "What The Bleep Do We Know? The year's most unexpected indie hit in American cinemas - a film about quantum physics - is about to open here. The movie contains interviews from such leaders in their fields as: Candace. A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. Blending New Age mysticism and quantum physics, What The Bleep Do We Know?! Publishers Weekly What the Bleep Do We Know!? [5] Author Barrie Dolnick adds that "people don't want to learn how to do one thing. While many of its interviewees and subjects are professional scientists in the fields of physics, chemistry, and biology, one of them has noted that the film quotes him out of context. Some ideas discussed in the film are: In the narrative segments of the film, Marlee Matlin portrays Amanda, a photographer who plays the role of everywoman as she experiences her life from startlingly new and different perspectives. - Dr. But whenever one is dealing with highly speculative ideas that have no connection with experiment, theres a danger of becoming delusional and thinking that youre doing real science when youre not. If it were manifest, you could run at a wall a lot of times, and every now and then you'd spontaneously appear on the other side of the wall. Cast. And while I dont think supersymmetric GUTs are anywhere near as promising as many people seem to think, they are a much saner idea than many that dominate research these days (take the Landscape, please). And most thoughtful members of the "spiritual but not religious" camp would take issue if you chopped off their big toes and then responded to their complaints with a lofty "it's all in your mind." Everyone is still talking about the movie What the Bleep Do We Know!? Quantum physics doesn't need them to. We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations. Interviews with scientists and authors, animated bits, and a storyline involving a deaf photographer are used in this docudrama to illustrate the link between quantum mechanics, neurobiology, human consciousness and day-to-day reality. He even called in to a radio program the director was on to discuss this and was cut off. "What the Bleep Do We Know," as it is referred to for convenience, is not a conventional documentary about quantum physics. After a successful DVD launch in March of 2005, Fox . Guess that could not have been done to easily in the Catholic church. "Particles appear and disappear where do they go when they're not here? With researchers and theoretical scientists leading the way, it takes the reader through the looking glass of quantum physics into a universe that is more bizarre and alive than ever imagined. On certain scales, for certain times, in certain regions, everything goes and strange things happen. "[10], What the Bleep Do We Know!? Check my single page unpublishable http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf. Can the weirdness of quantum mechanics make you well, or make you wealthy? They were spreading their methods of meditation but that was not the main thing that impressed me. The quantum world does pervade everything around us, but as Richard Feynman liked to say, "Scientific creativity is imagination in a straitjacket." On August 1, 2006 What the Bleep! About. And there's the matter of scale the brain lights up in scans much more brightly when you're seeing something than when you're reminiscing. [12][13] Lisa Randall refers to the film as "the bane of scientists". We will write a custom Essay on Philosophy Meaning of Arntz's Movie "What the Bleep Do We Know" specifically for you. But to insist, as one on-screen interviewee does, that the material world around us is just one "possible movement of consciousness" undermines the possibility of any objective, external reality--something fundamental to many religions and to science. But sounding like magic and being magic are two different things. Q. Knight's compound outside the town of Yelm has been built over the former horse-breeding grounds: The estate consists of JZ's present home, a white 12,800 square foot French chateau styled 4-bedroom house, her original home (a 1,600 sq. - - We want to bridge divides to reach everyone. ?, with over 15 hours of material on three double-sided DVDs. I started out thinking that BLEEP 2 would be a ground-breaking update covering ideas and discoveries in quantum physics, brain neurology and consciousness studies introduced over a decade ago. Hobbs further disputed the film's use of the ten percent of the brain myth. ft. house now used as offices), the Great Hall (a converted 15,375 sq. If your mind is the "observer" that quantum physics talks about, you should be able to choose which of the many possible realities around you comes into existence you can create your own reality, and probably come off anti-anxiety medication to boot. have described distinct assertions made as pseudoscience. "The movie is saying that somehow we can all get together and, with our collective thought processes, we can influence the outcome" of physical events - be they life experiences or scientific. When they use the word 'observe', they actually mean 'interact with', not look at or think about.). the film What The Bleep Do We Know It was an information that really left me speechless and I ordered his books at once techhose.d-webhost.orphans.co.uk 2 / 11. It's hard to say where Candace Pert got the low-down on what the Native American Indians did or didn't see when Columbus and the gang hit the horizon. extended versions of What the BLEEP Do We Know! (I haven't). But that doesn't mean that astrology is true. Even followers of spiritual traditions that believe in worldly illusion will have problems with "Bleep." We may be able to use quantum communication in ways that we haven't done before. Some movies are so bad, they're funny. People tend to believe that the fact that a certain kind of research is pursued by sizable numbers of people with very good credentials is enough to mean it must be good research. Mon August 23, 2021: The US Food and Drug Administration on Monday granted full approval to the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine for people age 16 and older. It's more like a collision in the editing room between talking heads, an impenetrable human parable and a hallucinogenic animated cartoon. suggest that science allows you to capitalize on quantum possibilities, but theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss says it's just a load of bleep.