Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. EDIT: As Strongbad points out in a comment the term Awaiting Editors Decision strictly indicates that the paper has passed reviewers. While editing corrects the structure of your article whereas a peer reviewer gives you an extensive analysis. rev2023.3.3.43278. But in view of. That's it . edit: so no. Wishing you the best of luck on your paper. . Even if the reviewers give positive recommendations, the editor can decide to reject a paper. [CDATA[// > If your article is accepted, it could take anywhere from a few months to three years for the journal to publish your piece. Please avoid repeating information that is already present in the abstract and introduction. Answer (1 of 4): Hi! At this point, you realize you've reached the end of the email, thus eliminating the possibility that some subsequent paragraph will say, "However, today is Opposite Day.". Revised papers should be accompanied by a point-by-point response to all the comments made by all the referees. [1] Sovereignty entails hierarchy within the state, as well as external autonomy for states. and JavaScript. Answered by Editage Insights Second reason: methodological approach and results. The manuscript subject falls outside of the Aims and Scope of the selected journal or is not likely to be of interest to the readership of the selected journal. Nat Neurosci 5, 917 (2002). No news is good news? Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Graduated from ENSAT (national agronomic school of Toulouse) in plant sciences in 2018, I pursued a CIFRE doctorate under contract with SunAgri and INRAE in Avignon between 2019 and 2022. Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. The peer review file is published online as a supplementary peer review file. section 8 houses for rent in stockbridge, ga editor decision started nature rejection and if it is not clarified on the . The difference between the phonemes /p/ and /b/ in Japanese, How to handle a hobby that makes income in US. You said the finals started tomorrow. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative, Nature Neuroscience (Nat Neurosci) Did this satellite streak past the Hubble Space Telescope so close that it was out of focus? Under these circumstances, the editors letter will state explicitly whether or not a resubmitted version would be considered. Most journals typically take around 4-12 weeks to share their final decision. Its been more than 2 months since I submitted my manuscript to a journal. answered Jul 2, 2014 at 10:14. Sometimes they are more busy. Because it was sitting in my barn / shop for over 12 years!! Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. ]]> We understand your anxiety :-) However, the decision on manuscript acceptance depends on several factors, such as availability and responsiveness of peer reviewers and the extent of revisions recommended. If the reviewers wish to be named their names will appear in alphabetical order at the end of the paper in a statement as below: Any reviewers that wish to remain anonymous will be acknowledged using a slightly modified statement: If no reviewers agree to be named, we will still acknowledge their valuable service using the statement below: Nature makes decisions about submitted papers as rapidly as possible.